1. 1. My
interviewee by choice was my mother, Crystal Rosenlund, whose maiden name is Richardson.
She is a sister to two younger, twin brothers and who was born in Ohio on
September 15, 1974. She grew up in this area and in Arizona and California as
her father was involved in the military. Her mother was mostly home and father
left after she was age fifteen. Both mother and father were from pretty average
sized families and my Grandmother Carolyn, her mother, was the youngest of
three children. My Grandfather Alfred, her father, was one of two children from
his mother Buela who my mother was very close to. She is still alive and well
at age 90 and her other grandparents from her mother’s side are also still
alive. Mildred Scott, her grandmother was also someone she was pretty close to.
My mother was raised in a family with thick twang accents and of the Catholic religion
but never really fit in to this belief as she is now Mormon. She was always the
calmer of her siblings as her two brothers were big troublemakers all growing
up. Her family consists of descendants from a European and Native American ethnic
background.
2. 2. I
was pretty comfortable during this interview because my mother and I have
discussed family history quite thoroughly a handful of times, yet it always is
a little bit of a deep conversation when brought up because her father left her
and her brothers when they were still kids and was abusive to her mother. So
bringing back these thoughts were a little painful to think about for us both
as is thinking about who she was closest to because her Grandmother Buela was
who she was closest to and now she is getting much older so she worries about
her. If I were to have done this interview on someone I was not related to I
believe it would have been harder to be as interested in all the information
and easier to not get so attached or effected by the answers. I feel like the thoroughness
of this interview went well because we are able to open up to each other about everything
but it would have been harder to get personal with someone unrelated maybe.
3.3. I
never met my Grandfather on my mother’s side so I cannot speak too much for
him, but the socialization level on my Grandmother and mother’s side is
apparent by them both. They both tend to have very nervous laughs and may seem
very sociable but are more introvert than outgoing. My mother even more so than
my Grandmother as well as my uncles. They are more closed off with people than
someone who is super outgoing per say. My mother always felt more of a
closeness to her father even though he left them at a young age because she
always wanted to rekindle that relationship and always felt maybe it was her
and her mother’s fault for why he left them but my uncles have seemed to favor
their mother more so, knowing of how harsh their father was with them and their
mother. My mother was his “favorite” so
to speak when he was around so I think it confused her most. It seems that in
my mother’s side of the family the maternal roles take the lead more so. In her
side of the family there is a trend of an average amount of kids everyone has
but in my mother’s case she broke that trend with her 7 children. Within her
family there are some ethnic differences within her cousins as some are also
African American but this has not shown much of a difference in the way they
socialize since they all come from the same area so they all are adapted to that
environment specifically.
4. 4. I
know my mother’s and father’s relatives both pretty well, but I have not
socialized an equal amount with all of them unfortunately. My mother’s
relatives all mainly live in Ohio and I live in California so that basically
speaks for itself. My father’s relatives are pretty spread out and some have
passed now so I only got the past years I had with them to look back on. I
would say that my Grandfather on my father’s side is the biggest influence in
decisions that side of my family makes because he is the one that is kind of a
crutch for all of the children and their children when things get tough and is
always thinking of every possibility to make sure things run smoothly. On my mother’s
side there is not really a decision maker for that side of my family because
they all kind of do whatever they feel like no matter how crazy and no one
listens to each other whether it’s advice or an order, including the children.
My mother would definitely be the most level headed from her side of the family
though. On my mother’s side family members that are married into the family
does not really occur often since most are not married but my mother is and her
husband is treated more friendly than my grandmother’s actual children as if he
is still always a guest or friend of the family, but on my father’s side I have
an Aunt Gayle that was married into the family as well as an Uncle Brian
married into the family and Gayle is treated like she is one of their own, but
Brian is secretly out of the loop more so from the group of family members that
are closest but that is mainly based off
of his personality. There are huge differences I have noticed within the two
sides of my families regarding gender. On my mother’s side it seems as though
the boys in the family are always favored and babied more so but most of the
boys on this side are not very independent and this may be why. On my father’s
side the girls are more favored in the adults it seems though they are
independent just majority are girls and the men on this side adore them all. I
have really gotten to analyze my family a lot more within this assignment and I
actually enjoyed doing so a lot I am able to understand the differences in
character and why a lot better in each side of my family.
How fortunate you are to still have a great-grandmother! That is rare in this day and age. She would have been a fascinating person to interview for this assignment and I'm assuming she doesn't live close enough for that to happen? If you get a chance, you may consider conducting this interview with her some day soon. Family history is valuable and she would be an incredible source... not to mention but I bet she would love to be asked about her own childhood and family.
ReplyDelete"If I were to have done this interview on someone I was not related to I believe it would have been harder to be as interested in all the information and easier to not get so attached or effected by the answers. "
A well-balanced answer. :-) I agree that it would have been easier to not be attached or biased, but sometimes people actually respond more openly to non-family members. The history, the possiblity of judgement and the chance of awkward information getting out to other family members is less when dealing with an outsider. You might be surprised at how often people see an outsider interviewer as an opportunity to let go of their reticence and talk openly about sensitive matters, kind of like they might to a family doctor.
The third section was looking for more formal applications of the kinship chapter to your own family. Any issues of residence patterns (neolocal, patrilocal, etc). What you describe may be more matriarchal than matrilineal. You can have a patrilineal descent pattern with a matriarchal family pattern.
Interesting observations on the issues of gender in your family. Can you trace this to any point in origin or offer a possible explanation? A little more explanation into the ethnic background of your family might have shed some light on this.
Otherwise, well done.
Hello Chloe,
ReplyDeleteAfter reading a couple of blogs I am noticing a pattern of absentee fathers. At first I thought that this was an ethnic thing but now I am starting to wonder if it a culture thing since there were several different ethnic groups that are experiencing this problem. I thought that it would be easier to do an interview if I didn't know the person, I would be able to let them speak freely without any attachment or that feeling that things were getting too personal. Good blog thanks for sharing part of your family with us.