Wednesday, May 18, 2016

Week 6: Politics and Violence Post


It is said that the laws are universal regarding violence and killing within different cultures but when it comes to the Yanomamo Indians there is some differences in how they deal with issues. They Yanomamo don't have many formal laws or guidelines to uphold. They don't even have a chief or judges. When they deal with an issue it is delt with more within the family and on their own rather than by going to the law to settle it for them. They don't have a written language or number system really so this just shows how much differences they have with most all cultures as well. 

In the Yanomamo population revenge killings are usually a result of sexual jealousy. This can be from any form between sexual infidelity, rape, or failure to give a promised girl in marriage, and others. The process is done in various ways. Some involve shooting with bows and arrows with the intent to kill. The most common motive behind the original killing is women and the most common cause behind the raids that follow is for killing the first time so it goes around basically. The raids are usually the aftermath of a revenge killing within the village. 

The revenge killings are of course life-threatening for those who are involved, obviously but those who obtain the title of unokais. To gain this title it means you are a man who has killed and then once you have killed you have to perform a ritual purification called unokaimou. This ritual helps deflect any supernatural harm that might come the killer's way from the soul of the one whose blood he shed, this also is a form of honor to them because this means they become an unokai and that it is widely known who they are and who they killed. Recruitment is on a self-selective basis though boys are rewarded for signs of aggression. The benefit of an unokai member seems to be that they are not as likely to be killed in the raids because of their status. This is proven by the statistics that the unokai populate most of the village because the rest have suffered in the raids. The benefit of a non-unokais is that they don't have to go out and risk their life to have a killing on their hands if they do not wish to be of this status so they are not as in the danger as others would be.

There are many ways the Yanomamo culture's revenge killing's effect their political structure, social status/ social organization, kinship, and marriage and reproduction. The revenge killing's influence political structure because they deal with their issues through families so when they are involved in revenge killings in the form of a raid they can be risking the strength of their group politically and socially because if they die then that means their group becomes weaker in society as well as in politics of the Yanomamo population. The influence that revenge killing has on kinship is not in their favor for the most part. Though it sometimes adds to the number of people behind a group that is involved in a raid if they have kin they are close to, but this also will risk the lives of the kin that are involved which will create once again a smaller group politically and socially and will end with no kin because they are the main scapegoat for actions of those who do revenge killing when it comes time for raids since they are close to those who may have done the killing before. Now in reference to marriage and reproduction men are more likely to be polygynous and have many wives within their lifetime and this will create more kin for their raids because they have more supply as in women. The ones who are more likely to have more kin are the political leaders who marry each others families if they are equal in leadership of a village. This builds a stronger force for raids. 

I think it is very important to have laws and consequences for something that we "shouldn't want to do" because killing others based off revenge is an instinctual feeling of a mammal. We can cover our instincts with these laws that we know will only damper our happiness and not theirs but if we don't have these strict laws then some of us will become more violent and vengeful people. It is hard to control or communicate the feeling of losing someone dear to you because of someone else unless through anger, hate, and hurt. So if it is fresh in your mind and someone you love is to pass because of someone else whether it was premeditated or accidental, the idea of taking what they took from someone you love will probably cross your mind because when in that situation it seems there is no better justice than to take a life when they took a life first, but we have to remember we don't want to live in a society like that because in the end after you do your justice you still won't have that person back and now you will feel like you are just as bad as the person who killed first and this will not only lead in a lot of homicides but suicides as well and we would start to become our own extinction. 

3 comments:

  1. "It is said that the laws are universal regarding violence and killing within different cultures but when it comes to the Yanomamo Indians there is some differences in how they deal with issues."

    Just an opening quibble here. No one argues that the laws are universal. The *presence* of these laws are universal... all cultures have them, but that doesn't mean anyone is arguing that the laws themselves are the same or "universal".

    "They Yanomamo don't have many formal laws or guidelines to uphold. "

    The Yanomamo don't have laws like ours, formally written and supported by a formal judicial system, but does that really mean that they have no laws at all regarding killing? The culture of the Yanomamo, with regard to killing, isn't just a anarchist population with killing happening randomly and with no repercussions. On the contrary, it is a structured system, with clear rules and consequences the designate how people are expected to behave and respond to a killing and by killing in return. Just because that system doesn't resemble ours and isn't written down, are we justified in saying that they aren't actually "laws"? Careful about the ethnocentrism here.

    Let's back up a little and look at the act of killing itself and how we respond to it. The article clearly lays out when killing is considered acceptable and understandable for the Yanomamo. Is killing always wrong in Western society? Or do we recognize circumstances where killing is understandable and not punished? How about war? Police shooting a person who is endangering others? A person defending their home, family or themselves?

    Good description of the process of revenge killing, particularly noting the cyclic nature of the process.

    Good analysis of the costs/benefits of the unokais vs. non-unokais status. Just note that one of the costs to being a non-unokais is that you will have a much lower reproductive success than an unokais, regardless of the lower risk by avoiding revenge killings.

    Okay on your discussion of how revenge killings impact other aspects of the Yanomamo culture, but I disagree with the impact on kin. Those who achieve unokais status are much more likely to marry, and even marry multiple times. Not only does that increase your offspring (increasing kin) but everytime you marry, your wife's kin are added to your kin. Your kin grows exponentially with marriage, and remember that if you or your family are hurt or killed, your kin are obligated to take revenge for you. So who in their right mind would attack a man with a high unokais status? This is actually a deterrent to being attacked and increases the survival rates of unokais.

    "... killing others based off revenge is an instinctual feeling of a mammal"

    You are on the right track by bringing in the issue of "instince". Humans are part of the animal world and we can't ignore biology when talking about cultural behaviors. Behaviors, in general, don't happen out of the blue. They occur because those behaviors benefit the person doing those behaviors in some way. So do people in our society who kill do so because they receive some benefit? Certainly those who kill in defense of property, family or themselves receive a benefit, but how about a thief or a murderer? Often the murder happens in the process of obtaining some type of resources. You also see gang related murders that follow a pattern similar to the unokais system (and little kinship involved) by the way, which assigns power and status benefits to those taking part, correct? So we have laws against these behaviors not because no one should want to do them, but because people can benefit from doing them, and we need to provide a cost (imprisonment) to balance the benefits to deter these behaviors.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "they can be risking the strength of their group politically and socially because if they die then that means their group becomes weaker." It is easy to dismiss tribes such as these as archaic and uncivilized, but there is a complexity to their system that means every action must be carefully weighed because of its potential impact on social stature, politics, and family strength.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Chloe!

    Way to present the Yanomamo people from the article. :) I enjoyed reading the last part of your post related to laws. The only point I would have added is that without those laws put into place, our vengeance cycle probably wouldn't end. It's not just that our own personal desire for justice would be fulfilled but we still wouldn't have our loved one back; people would always seek to take the lives of the people who took their loved ones' lives. We'd open up a whole vengeance cycle if we didn't have those laws in place.

    ReplyDelete